CIT - Citizen Voting

Supports:

• Multi-factorial Consensus
• Credible Neutrality

Context:

In the DAO landscape, governance and decision-making processes often need to reflect the ethos of decentralization fully. One person, one vote is a democratic principle that supports an equal say for all participants, regardless of their wealth or stake in the system.

Problem:

Implementing a fair and equitable voting system where each participant has an equal influence is challenging, especially when addressing the Sybil issue where a single agent could create multiple identities to gain disproportionate control.

Forces:

• Equality vs. Stake Weight: Balancing the influence of each vote while considering the stakes held by participants.
• Sybil Attacks: Ensuring robust identity verification mechanisms to prevent fraudulent vote manipulation.
• Technological Limitations: Deploying scalable and secure systems that maintain the integrity and anonymity of votes.
• Community Trust: Developing a system that promotes fairness and transparency to gain and maintain community trust.

Solution:

Citizen Voting in DAOs should be implemented using cryptographic methods like zero-knowledge proofs or token-based systems where tokens are non-transferable and identity verification ensures one token per verified human. This system can work alongside a digitally verified identity system, ensuring that every member has only one account eligible for voting.

Real-world examples include DAOs like Democracy Earth, which implements sovereign identities allowing for one person one vote within digital environments. Similarly, BrightID offers a social identity network that can link individuals uniquely to their respective DAO voting rights, thus mitigating Sybil attacks.

Therefore:

Adopt Citizen Voting to ensure each member has an equal say in the decision-making process, backed by a secure, Sybil-resistant identity verification mechanism.